There is no shortage of RTV-2 silicones on the market positioned as alternatives to ELASTOSIL RT 622. In practice, users most often turn to solutions from manufacturers such as Momentive (e.g. RTV 225, RTV 227), Dow (Sylgard 170, Sylgard 184), Shin-Etsu (KE-1300T, KE-1310ST), Elkem (Silbione RTV 440/450), or ACC Silicones (QSil 216/218). These are good materials – but they are designed with different priorities.
This is where the key difference emerges. RT622 is not just “another potting silicone,” but a material with an exceptionally well-balanced combination of properties: softness, mechanical strength, and long-term stability. In many cases, alternatives turn out to be either too hard, mechanically weaker, or require adjustments to the processing technology. During initial testing, these differences may seem negligible – it is only in real-world operation that the gap becomes apparent.
Log in with Facebook
Log in with Google